Marketing spending is rebounding slowly. The latest CMO Survey (Fall 2024) finds marketers boosted budgets just 3.3% year‑over‑year, with digital spend growing 7.3%cmosurvey.org. Despite a tighter economic climate, marketing budgets now average about 9.4% of company revenue (up from 7.7% a year earlier) and roughly 11.4% of total corporate budgets cmosurvey.org. In other words, companies devote roughly one‑tenth of revenues to marketing. Within that, digital channels dominate: digital marketing budgets grew nearly 12% last year and are forecast to rise about 11.9% in the coming year cmosurvey.org. Traditional advertising is shrinking (–0.3% growth) as video, social media and other digital formats absorb the bulk of new spend cmosurvey.org. Content marketing is a high priority – indeed, industry surveys report that roughly three-quarters of marketing teams now use generative AI, and nearly 69% use it for image generation in campaign workflowsexplodingtopics.com. In short, e‑commerce and retail brands are committing more of their budgets to digital and visual content, making the cost of imagery a critical factor in overall spend.
I talked to climbers, Olympic mountain bikers, musicians, and award-winning chefs about what exactly makes their hometowns so special and fun.
Traditional Photography: How Costs Add Up
Traditional studio photography remains expensive in fashion e-commerce. Costs vary widely by complexity, but industry benchmarks put even basic product shots in the tens of dollars per image. For example, one high-volume photography service quotes about $39 per product photo plus a modest studio fee soona.co. In practice, budget e-tailers may pay roughly $20–$50 for a simple white‑background image. At the other extreme, a full-scale fashion shoot (with models, stylists, sets and high-end lighting) can run thousands of dollars per day. Freelance photographers often charge $1,000–$2,000 per day for commercial work soona.co, not including assistants or post-production. Thus:
- Basic e‑com shoot: White‑background or simple staged images, minimal styling. Prices can be as low as a few dozen dollars per shot (volume pricing with a studio, e.g. ~$39/image + studio fee soona.co).
- Mid-range shoot: Includes one or two models, basic styling, and some creative layouts. Expect $500–$1,000 per day for photographer and $600–$1,000/day each for a stylist or makeup artist squareshot.com. Including assistant(s) ($300–$450/day each squareshot.com) and retouching ($50–$150/hr squareshot.com), a mid-level session can cost several thousand dollars per day.
- High-end shoot: Top-tier fashion/editorial photography with multiple models, custom sets and post-production. Day rates can exceed $5,000–$10,000 for a star photographer, plus comparable fees for models and full art direction. For example, premium studios may charge tens of thousands for a multi-day campaign.
These costs add up quickly: even a single campaign of 50 styles can easily reach five figures. Every element contributes: studio rental or gear hire, talent fees, location fees, hair/makeup, props, set construction, and extensive editing. (One industry guide notes a photographer’s day can be $1–3K, a model $750–$1,000/day, a makeup artist $750–$1,000/day, and stylists $600–$1,000/daysquareshot.com squareshot.com.)
Total Cost Drivers: Studio, Talent, and Time
The biggest cost drivers in a product shoot are the crew and facilities. Key line items include:
- Studio and Equipment: Professional studios charge hourly or daily rates (often $500–$1,000+/day) to cover space, lights, cameras and other gear. Many studios also keep a prop wardrobe, which helps, but specialized sets or location shoots add rental and transport costs.
- Photographer and Crew: Experienced photographers command high day rates (often $1–3K/day squareshot.com). Supporting staff – camera assistants, digital techs ($300–$750/day) and producers – are usually also paid daily. Each extra person (stylist, art director, producer) adds another $500–$1,500+ per day.
- Models and Talent: Professional models typically cost $750–$1,000+ per day squareshot.com (often more for well-known faces). Makeup artists and hair stylists similarly run $750–$1,000/day each squareshot.com. (If hand models or child models are needed, expect separate rates.) Note that licensed “talent usage rights” can add to fees, especially for print campaigns.
- Styling and Props: Wardrobe stylists, art directors and prop masters each have day rates ($600–$1,000+). Any purchased or rented clothing, accessories and props are additional expenses. Complex shoots (e.g. integrating technology products or mannequins) require specialized props/rigging.
- Retouching and Post: After the shoot, images must be color-corrected and retouched. Retouchers often charge $50–$150 per hour squareshot.com. A typical fashion image may take 1–3 hours of editing. Bulk work can be cheaper per image, but time adds up.
- Time: A multi-look shoot may span 2–3 days (or more), multiplying all above costs. A rush turnaround or weekend shoot may incur premium rates. Administrative overhead (project management, digital asset management, even taxes and insurance) also factor in.
All told, a small e-commerce brand might easily spend $5–10K on a one-day shoot with simple styling. A major retailer launching a new line could invest $50K–$100K or more on a multi-day campaign when you include labor and overhead. For context, the global e-commerce product photography market was $129 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow to $275B by 2030 pymnts.com, reflecting how critical high-quality images are online. (Indeed, sites with great visuals see about 30% higher conversions and up to 22% fewer returns pymnts.com.)
AI-Generated Visuals: Benefits and Benchmarks
AI-driven imaging is rapidly reshaping this cost equation. Modern AI tools can produce studio-like product shots or even fully styled lifestyle images at a fraction of the traditional cost pymnts.com.
A single operator at a laptop can create a catalog of images in hours, replacing days of shooting.
Key advantages of AI-generated imagery include:
- Radical Cost and Time Savings: According to industry data, generative AI can slash production costs by double-digit percentages. Marketers report that AI automation lowered marketing overhead by about 8.9% on average cmosurvey.org (and an independent analysis suggests potential savings up to ~15–20% explodingtopics.com). Instead of paying $1K/day per person, a brand may pay for a software license or cloud credits. And what once took 2–3 days can often be done in under 24 hours with AI.
- Scalability: AI models can output thousands of images from minimal input. Once a base product image or 3D model is created, you can generate endless variants (different colors, backgrounds, environments) without new photoshoots. This is ideal for large catalogs. In practice, retailers using AI imaging can do in hours what formerly required assembling a large crew for a week.
- New Creative Capabilities: Generative AI unlocks features not possible (or too costly) with conventional photography. For instance, AI can automatically place garments on diverse virtual models or even on the shopper’s own photo. Google Shopping’s latest “AI Mode” lets users virtually try on billions of apparel listings on their own photos, powered by a custom image-generation model that realistically renders clothing drape and fit blog.google. Other tools can swap out backgrounds (show products in various settings), change lighting styles, or animate products into short clips. These personalized and interactive visuals can drive engagement and conversion.
- Consistency and Control: AI ensures uniform style across all images. Every product can be lit and presented in the exact same way (aligned shadows, matched color tones), improving brand cohesion. If style guidelines change (say, a new backdrop or shot angle), AI can quickly re-generate thousands of images to match, without re-shooting.
- Broad Adoption: Brands are rapidly adopting these tools. For example, fashion retailer Mango has already begun incorporating AI-generated imagery into campaigns to keep pace with trends pymnts.com. More broadly, a recent study found that about 73% of marketing teams use generative AI today, with image generation being the top use case (69% of them) explodingtopics.com. In CMO surveys, AI’s role in marketing tasks jumped ~59% in a year – now about 11.1% of all activities cmosurvey.org.
In short, AI can replicate many aspects of traditional photography at far lower cost, while enabling new features. PYMNTS reports that emerging AI photo studios produce “new kinds of product images at a fraction of traditional studio costs,” offering on‑the‑fly customization pymnts.com. Given that high-quality imagery typically boosts sales, this shift means e-commerce brands can get more creative, personalized visuals without ballooning budgets. As one industry expert puts it, retailers no longer “need to hire a photographer and a model, stage a set… [they] just have to write a prompt and get a reference photo” to create professional-looking product shots pymnts.com.
Sources: Authoritative industry reports and surveys have been used for all statistics above. Recent CMO Survey data (2024–25) provides the marketing budget and AI adoption figures cmosurvey.org cmosurvey.org. Verified market reports and PYMNTS News offer benchmarks on product imagery and performance pymnts.com pymnts.com. Published pricing guides from industry leaders (e.g. Soona, Squareshot) inform the cost ranges soona.co soona.co squareshot.com. All figures reflect the latest available data (2024–2025) for e-commerce fashion brands.
